Brad Livingston, in His Official Capacity as the Executive Director of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice v. Leslie Arrington, for Herself and on Behalf of All Those Similarly Situated Janet Lock, for Herself and on Behalf of All Those Similarly Situated Kathy Williams, for Herself and on Behalf of All Those Similarly Situated and Laura Beeman
This text of Brad Livingston, in His Official Capacity as the Executive Director of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice v. Leslie Arrington, for Herself and on Behalf of All Those Similarly Situated Janet Lock, for Herself and on Behalf of All Those Similarly Situated Kathy Williams, for Herself and on Behalf of All Those Similarly Situated and Laura Beeman (Brad Livingston, in His Official Capacity as the Executive Director of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice v. Leslie Arrington, for Herself and on Behalf of All Those Similarly Situated Janet Lock, for Herself and on Behalf of All Those Similarly Situated Kathy Williams, for Herself and on Behalf of All Those Similarly Situated and Laura Beeman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-11-00266-CV
Brad Livingston, in his Official Capacity as the Executive Director
of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Appellant
v.
Leslie Arrington, for herself and on behalf of all of those similarly situated;
Janet Lock, for herself and on behalf of all those similarly situated;
Kathy Williams, for herself and on behalf of all those similarly situated and
Laura Beeman, for herself and on behalf of all those similarly situated, Appellees
FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 419TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
NO. D-1-GN-10-000515, HONORABLE LORA J. LIVINGSTON, JUDGE PRESIDING
This proceeding is an interlocutory appeal from a district court order granting a temporary injunction against appellant Livingston. During the pendency of this interlocutory appeal, the underlying cause proceeded to a final judgment in which the district court granted permanent injunctive relief against Livingston, who thereafter appealed from that final judgment. (1) In light of these developments, appellees have moved to dismiss the present interlocutory appeal as moot, and Livingston does not oppose that disposition. We agree that Livingston's interlocutory appeal is now moot, see Isuani v. Manske-Sheffield Radiology Grp., P.A., 802 S.W.2d 235, 236-37 (Tex. 1991) (per curiam), and, accordingly, grant appellees' motion and dismiss the appeal for want of subject-matter jurisdiction.
__________________________________________
Bob Pemberton, Justice
Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Pemberton and Henson
Dismissed as Moot
Filed: April 25, 2012
1. No. 03-12-00205-CV.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Brad Livingston, in His Official Capacity as the Executive Director of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice v. Leslie Arrington, for Herself and on Behalf of All Those Similarly Situated Janet Lock, for Herself and on Behalf of All Those Similarly Situated Kathy Williams, for Herself and on Behalf of All Those Similarly Situated and Laura Beeman, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brad-livingston-in-his-official-capacity-as-the-executive-director-of-the-texapp-2012.