Brad Francis v. CIR
This text of Brad Francis v. CIR (Brad Francis v. CIR) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________
No. 18-2447 ___________________________
Brad S. Francis; Christine C. Francis
lllllllllllllllllllllAppellants
v.
Commissioner of Internal Revenue
lllllllllllllllllllllAppellee ____________
Appeal from The United States Tax Court ____________
Submitted: May 6, 2019 Filed: May 9, 2019 [Unpublished] ____________
Before COLLOTON, BOWMAN, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges. ____________
PER CURIAM.
Brad and Christine Francis appeal from the tax court’s1 dismissal--for lack of prosecution--of their challenge to the Commissioner of Internal Revenue’s notice asserting an income deficiency for 2013. Following a careful review, we conclude
1 The Honorable L. Paige Marvel, Chief Judge, United States Tax Court. that the tax court had jurisdiction over the case, see Walters v. United States, 474 F.3d 1137, 1139 (8th Cir. 2007) (lower court’s determination of jurisdiction is reviewed de novo); and did not abuse its discretion by dismissing the case for lack of prosecution, see Long v. Comm’r, 742 F.2d 1141, 1143 (8th Cir. 1984) (per curiam) (tax court’s dismissal for failure to prosecute is reviewed for abuse of discretion). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Brad Francis v. CIR, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brad-francis-v-cir-ca8-2019.