Brad Filsinger v. Meeri Filsinger
This text of 225 S.W.3d 29 (Brad Filsinger v. Meeri Filsinger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION
Bradford Filsinger appeals from an order granting a writ of habeas corpus. He raises several issues pertaining to the trial court’s subject matter jurisdiction of the child custody proceeding and its authority to issue a writ of habeas corpus requiring the return of his son to his former wife, Meeri Filsinger. An order granting a writ of habeas corpus is not an appealable order. Gray v. Rankin, 594 S.W.2d 409 (1980); Zeissig v. Zeissig, 600 S.W.2d 353, 357 (Tex.Civ.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 1980, no writ). We dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
225 S.W.3d 29, 2005 WL 1992541, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brad-filsinger-v-meeri-filsinger-texapp-2005.