Brad Carter v. National Security Agency

Fourth Circuit

Brad Carter v. National Security Agency

54 F.3d 772, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 17368, 1995 WL 311609

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedMay 22, 1995

Docket95-1269

StatusPublished

This text of 54 F.3d 772 (Brad Carter v. National Security Agency) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Brad Carter v. National Security Agency, 54 F.3d 772, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 17368, 1995 WL 311609 (4th Cir. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

54 F.3d 772
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Brad CARTER, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 95-1269

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted April 20, 1995.
Decided May 22, 1995.

Brad Carter, appellant pro se. Charles Joseph Peters, Sr., Office of the United States Attorney, Baltimore, MD, for appellee.

Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order awarding summary judgment to the United States in his action filed under the Freedom of Information Act ("FOIA"), 5 U.S.C. Sec. 552 (1988) and the Privacy Act of 1974, 5 U.S.C. Sec. 552a (1988). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Carter v. National Security Agency, No. CA-93-3847-MJG (D. Md. Jan. 18, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

54 F.3d 772
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Brad CARTER, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 95-1269

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted April 20, 1995.
Decided May 22, 1995.

Brad Carter, appellant pro se. Charles Joseph Peters, Sr., Office of the United States Attorney, Baltimore, MD, for appellee.

Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order awarding summary judgment to the United States in his action filed under the Freedom of Information Act ("FOIA"), 5 U.S.C. Sec. 552 (1988) and the Privacy Act of 1974, 5 U.S.C. Sec. 552a (1988). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Carter v. National Security Agency, No. CA-93-3847-MJG (D. Md. Jan. 18, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

54 F.3d 772, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 17368, 1995 WL 311609, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brad-carter-v-national-security-agency-ca4-1995.