Brackney v. Shreve
1 N.J.L. 38
Opinion
This is erroneous ; the action should have been in the name of Smith, the principal.
Reverse the judgment.
Note. — See Jones v. Hart’s Executors, 1 Hen. & Munf. 471, 476.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Brackney v. Shreve, 1 N.J.L. 38 (N.J. 1790).
1 N.J.L. 38 (Brackney v. Shreve) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.