Brackett v. Vining

49 Me. 356
CourtSupreme Judicial Court of Maine
DecidedJuly 1, 1860
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 49 Me. 356 (Brackett v. Vining) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brackett v. Vining, 49 Me. 356 (Me. 1860).

Opinion

Goodenow, J.

The plaintiff did not comply with the directions of, the warrant, by virtue of which he took the property in controversy, nor with the requirements of the statute relating to the sale of the property so taken. The warrant, therefore, is insufficient to protect him. He kept the property too long' — beyond the expiration of the time, when it should have been sold — and, by so doing, must be regarded as a trespasser áb initio. It is unnecessary to consider the alleged illegality of the proceedings in the assessment of the tax. The exceptions must be sustained, verdict set aside, and a new trial granted.

Tenney, C. J., Rice, Cutting, May and Davis, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Perham v. Putnam
267 P. 305 (Montana Supreme Court, 1928)
Gay v. Burgess
59 Ala. 575 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1877)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
49 Me. 356, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brackett-v-vining-me-1860.