Brackett v. Prince

306 A.2d 763, 113 N.H. 302, 1973 N.H. LEXIS 259
CourtSupreme Court of New Hampshire
DecidedJune 29, 1973
DocketNo. 6083
StatusPublished

This text of 306 A.2d 763 (Brackett v. Prince) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brackett v. Prince, 306 A.2d 763, 113 N.H. 302, 1973 N.H. LEXIS 259 (N.H. 1973).

Opinion

Per curiam.

This is a petition to establish a boundary line and enjoin a continuous trespass to land. Trial before a Master, Leonard Hardwick, Esq., resulted in a boundary determination to which the plaintiff objected. Subsequent to the approval of the master’s report by Morris, J., plaintiff moved to reopen the case in order to present evidence of plaintiff’s chain of title. The master’s denial of this motion was approved by the Trial Court, Morris, J., who reserved and transferred the plaintiff’s exceptions. The refusal to reopen the case after the verdict to present evidence available during trial cannot be held an abuse of discretion. Sargent v. Janvrin, 109 N.H. 66, 242 A.2d 73 (1968); Ricker v. Mathews, 94 N.H. 313, 316, 53 A.2d 196, 198 (1947).

Plaintiff’s exceptions overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sargent v. Janvrin
242 A.2d 73 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1968)
Ricker v. Mathews
53 A.2d 196 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1947)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
306 A.2d 763, 113 N.H. 302, 1973 N.H. LEXIS 259, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brackett-v-prince-nh-1973.