Brackett v. City of Atlanta
This text of 179 S.E. 584 (Brackett v. City of Atlanta) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. The constitutional issues attempted to be raised in this case wore presented for the first time in the petition for certiorari, and therefore the assignments of error based thereon could not be considered by the superior court or reviewed by this court. Bolton v. City of Newnan, 147 Ga. 400 (94 S. E. 236).
2. Under the facts of the case, as disclosed by the record, it does not appear that the judge of the superior court abused his discretion in overruling the exceptions and traverses to the answer filed to the petition for certiorari, or in subsequently overruling the certiorari.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
179 S.E. 584, 51 Ga. App. 92, 1935 Ga. App. LEXIS 569, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brackett-v-city-of-atlanta-gactapp-1935.