Brackenridge v. Husted

Ohio Supreme Court

Brackenridge v. Husted

1 Wright 70, 1 Ohio Ch. 70

DecidedAugust 15, 1832

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Wright 70 (Brackenridge v. Husted) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Brackenridge v. Husted, 1 Wright 70, 1 Ohio Ch. 70 (Ohio 1832).

Pincite

Opinion

BY THE COURT.

The case below was an appeal taken from a non suit entered before a justice of the peace. The transcript filed was of the substance of the proceedings before the justice, and the Court of Common Pleas sustained the appeal. An appeal, by the law in force when this appeal was taken, lay from any judgment of a justice, and embraced a judgment of non suit. The substance is all that is looked to on error.

The judgment is affirmed with costs.

Appeal lies from non suit: 3 W. L. M. 141, 146, 147; distinguished under different statute, Ferrall v. Bluffton Lodge, 31 O. S. 463, 465.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BY THE COURT.

The case below was an appeal taken from a non suit entered before a justice of the peace. The transcript filed was of the substance of the proceedings before the justice, and the Court of Common Pleas sustained the appeal. An appeal, by the law in force when this appeal was taken, lay from any judgment of a justice, and embraced a judgment of non suit. The substance is all that is looked to on error.

The judgment is affirmed with costs.

Appeal lies from non suit: 3 W. L. M. 141, 146, 147; distinguished under different statute, Ferrall v. Bluffton Lodge, 31 O. S. 463, 465.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Wright 70, 1 Ohio Ch. 70, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brackenridge-v-husted-ohio-1832.