Brack v. State
This text of 96 So. 727 (Brack v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The defendant wag tried and convicted upon a complaint which charged him with a violation of section 7564 of the Code as amended by the. Acts of the Legislature 1915, p. 661.
The court sustained demurrers to the original complaint, whereupon the solicitor filed an amended complaint upon which the trial proceeded. This amended complaint is set out in the record.
The judgment entry recites, among other things:
“Whereupon the state of Alabama by its solicitor amends its complaint, whereupon defendant refiled demurrers to the complaint as amended and the same being submitted to and considered by the court, it i¡^ ordered that said demurrers be and the same are hereby overruled.”
No demurrers to the ^mended complaint are contained in the record. We are therefore unable to consider same and. must presume that the cpurt did not err in its rulings in this connection. The amended complaint, moreover, appears to be sufficient, as it follows the language of the statute.
The appeaj being upon the record proper, which is withbut error, the judgment appealed from must stand' affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
96 So. 727, 19 Ala. App. 258, 1923 Ala. App. LEXIS 127, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brack-v-state-alactapp-1923.