Bracht v. Adamson

211 S.W. 624, 1919 Tex. App. LEXIS 572
CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedApril 23, 1919
DocketNo. 6211.
StatusPublished

This text of 211 S.W. 624 (Bracht v. Adamson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bracht v. Adamson, 211 S.W. 624, 1919 Tex. App. LEXIS 572 (Tex. Ct. App. 1919).

Opinion

FLY, C. J.

This is a suit on a contract by which appellant purchased from appellee a carload of green tomatoes, sold to appellant at San Benito, Tex., to be shipped to Rock-port, Tex. The cause was tried by jury, and verdict and judgment rendered for appellee in the sum of $552.74, and an' attachment lien on a tract of land in Cameron county was foreclosed.

[1] Appellant has filed no brief, but appel-lee has filed a brief as permitted by rule 42 (142 S. W. xiv) for Courts of Civil Appeals, and we have considered that brief as giving a correct presentation of the case. We have examined the judgment as copied in the record, and find that it is one that can be affirmed under the presentation made by ap-pellee’s brief. Ball v. Dignowity, 68 S. W. 800.

[2] The authority of the county court to foreclose the attachment lien is settled by the Supreme Court. Hillebrand v. McMahan, 59 Tex. 450; Baker v. Pitluk, 205 S. W. 982.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Baker v. Pitluk & Meyer
205 S.W. 982 (Texas Supreme Court, 1918)
Hillebrand v. McMahan
59 Tex. 450 (Texas Supreme Court, 1883)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
211 S.W. 624, 1919 Tex. App. LEXIS 572, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bracht-v-adamson-texapp-1919.