Bracho v. Hernandez

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 8 * * *

9 ARIEL MORALES BRACHO, Case No. 2:20-cv-01306-RFB-EJY

10 Plaintiff, ORDER 11 v.

12 JORGE AUGUSTO CALDERON, HERTY CARVAJAL; JUAN MIRANDA; 13 YOENDRI CARBALLEDO HERNANDEZ, 14 Defendants. 15 16 Before the Court for consideration is the Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 7] of the 17 Honorable Elayna J. Youchah, United States Magistrate Judge, entered February 8, 2021. 18 A district court “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or 19 recommendations made by the magistrate.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). A party may file specific 20 written objections to the findings and recommendations of a magistrate judge. 28 U.S.C. § 21 636(b)(1); Local Rule IB 3-2(a). When written objections have been filed, the district court is 22 required to “make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed 23 findings or recommendations to which objection is made.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); see also Local 24 Rule IB 3-2(b). Where a party fails to object, however, a district court is not required to conduct 25 “any review,” de novo or otherwise, of the report and recommendations of a magistrate judge. 26 Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). Pursuant to Local Rule IB 3-2(a), objections were due 27 by February 22, 2021. No objections have been filed. The Court has reviewed the record in this 28 case and concurs with the Magistrate Judge’s recommendations. 1 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 7] is 2 ACCEPTED and ADOPTED in full. 3 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the above captioned matter brought by Plaintiff is 4 dismissed without prejudice. 5 DATED: May 11, 2021. 6 _____________________________ 7 RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II United States District Judge 8

10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28