Brach
This text of 173 Ct. Cl. 1176 (Brach) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Oivilicun pay; dismissal. — Plaintiff, a veteran preference eligible, sued to recover back pay lost as the result of his alleged illegal dismissal for cause from the Internal Bevenue Service. The case came before the court on plaintiff’s motion to dismiss the petition on the ground that plaintiff’s interim earnings exceeded the amount he would have earned had he not been separated from his position, and upon consideration of the motion under rule 67(a) (2) the court on October 22, 1965 ordered that the case be dismissed without prejudice.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
173 Ct. Cl. 1176, 1965 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 241, 1965 WL 1485, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brach-cc-1965.