Bracey v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Bracey v. State

102 S.E. 377, 24 Ga. App. 805, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 531

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedMarch 2, 1920

Docket11065

StatusPublished

This text of 102 S.E. 377 (Bracey v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bracey v. State, 102 S.E. 377, 24 Ga. App. 805, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 531 (Ga. Ct. App. 1920).

Pincite

Opinion

Luke, J.

1. The conviction of the defendant in this ease not depending solely upon circumstantial evidence, the court did not err in failing to charge the jury the law of circumstantial evidence, there being no request for such a charge.

2. There was no error in the charge of the court excepted to, and the evidence as shown by the answer to the petition for certiorari authorized the conviction of the defendant. Eor no 'reason assigned was it error to overrule the certiorari.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Luke, J.

1. The conviction of the defendant in this ease not depending solely upon circumstantial evidence, the court did not err in failing to charge the jury the law of circumstantial evidence, there being no request for such a charge.

2. There was no error in the charge of the court excepted to, and the evidence as shown by the answer to the petition for certiorari authorized the conviction of the defendant. Eor no 'reason assigned was it error to overrule the certiorari.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

102 S.E. 377, 24 Ga. App. 805, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 531, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bracey-v-state-gactapp-1920.