Bracero v. 2780 Realty Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Bracero v. 2780 Realty Co.

221 A.D.2d 270, 635 N.Y.S.2d 466, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12167

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 28, 1995·Published

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Bertram Katz, J.), entered July 7, 1994, which denied defendants’ motion to amend their answer so as to assert counterclaims against plaintiff parent, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

We affirm for the reasons stated in Nieves v 1097 Walton Realty Co. (220 AD2d 329) and Rosario v Bann Hous. Corp. (220 AD2d 345), holding that claims by a landlord that amount to negligent parental supervision are precluded under the circumstances here prevailing. Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Ellerin, Nardelli and Tom, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Bertram Katz, J.), entered July 7, 1994, which denied defendants’ motion to amend their answer so as to assert counterclaims against plaintiff parent, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

We affirm for the reasons stated in Nieves v 1097 Walton Realty Co. (220 AD2d 329) and Rosario v Bann Hous. Corp. (220 AD2d 345), holding that claims by a landlord that amount to negligent parental supervision are precluded under the circumstances here prevailing. Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Ellerin, Nardelli and Tom, JJ.

Bracero v. 2780 Realty Co., 221 A.D.2d 270, 635 N.Y.S.2d 466, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12167 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

221 A.D.2d 270 (Bracero v. 2780 Realty Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related