Brace v. United States
This text of Brace v. United States (Brace v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2007-5002
ROBERT BRACE,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES,
Defendant-Appellee.
Neal R. Devlin, Knox McLaughlin Gornall & Sennett, P.C., of Erie, Pennsylvania, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief was Richard A. Lanzillo.
Tamara N. Rountree, Attorney, Environment & Natural Resources Division, United States Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for defendant- appellee. With her on the brief were Matthew J. McKeown, Acting Assistant Attorney General, Susan Cook, Attorney, and Kathryn Kovacs, Attorney. Of counsel was William B. Lazarus, Attorney. Of counsel on the brief was Dana Ott, Office of General Counsel, United States Environmental Protection Agency, of Washington, DC.
Richard P. Rector, DLA Piper US LLP, of Washington, DC, for amicus curiae, National Association of Home Builders.
Appealed from: United States Court of Federal Claims
Judge Francis M. Allegra NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
2007-5002
___________________________
DECIDED: October 10, 2007 ___________________________
Before MICHEL, Chief Judge, LOURIE, and GAJARSA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
The judgment of the lower court is affirmed based upon the well-reasoned
opinion of the trial court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Brace v. United States, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brace-v-united-states-cafc-2007.