Brace v. State
This text of 39 So. 3d 338 (Brace v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DISMISSED. See Perrette v. State, 960 So.2d 888 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007) (holding that the filing of a timely pro se motion to withdraw plea alleging conflict with counsel suspended rendition of judgment and sentence, thus rendering appeal premature). Gf Clemons v. State, 3 So.3d 364, 365-66 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009) (“A timely motion to withdraw plea delays rendition of a defendant’s judgment and sentence until the trial court files a signed, written order disposing of the motion.”). The appellant’s pro se “Motion to Withdraw Supplemental II” is hereby denied as moot.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
39 So. 3d 338, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 6674, 2010 WL 1930134, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brace-v-state-fladistctapp-2010.