Brace v. State

39 So. 3d 338, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 6674, 2010 WL 1930134
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 14, 2010
Docket1D09-1216
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 39 So. 3d 338 (Brace v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brace v. State, 39 So. 3d 338, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 6674, 2010 WL 1930134 (Fla. Ct. App. 2010).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

DISMISSED. See Perrette v. State, 960 So.2d 888 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007) (holding that the filing of a timely pro se motion to withdraw plea alleging conflict with counsel suspended rendition of judgment and sentence, thus rendering appeal premature). Gf Clemons v. State, 3 So.3d 364, 365-66 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009) (“A timely motion to withdraw plea delays rendition of a defendant’s judgment and sentence until the trial court files a signed, written order disposing of the motion.”). The appellant’s pro se “Motion to Withdraw Supplemental II” is hereby denied as moot.

HAWKES, C.J., VAN NORTWTCK, and MARSTILLER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Marts v. State
39 So. 3d 338 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
39 So. 3d 338, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 6674, 2010 WL 1930134, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brace-v-state-fladistctapp-2010.