Brace v. State

39 So. 3d 338, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 6674, 2010 WL 1930134
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 14, 2010·No. 1D09-1216·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

DISMISSED. See Perrette v. State, 960 So.2d 888 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007) (holding that the filing of a timely pro se motion to withdraw plea alleging conflict with counsel suspended rendition of judgment and sentence, thus rendering appeal premature). Gf Clemons v. State, 3 So.3d 364, 365-66 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009) (“A timely motion to withdraw plea delays rendition of a defendant’s judgment and sentence until the trial court files a signed, written order disposing of the motion.”). The appellant’s pro se “Motion to Withdraw Supplemental II” is hereby denied as moot.

HAWKES, C.J., VAN NORTWTCK, and MARSTILLER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brace v. State, 39 So. 3d 338, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 6674, 2010 WL 1930134 (Fla. Ct. App. 2010).

39 So. 3d 338 (Brace v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Marts v. State
39 So. 3d 338 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)