Brabham v. Turner

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Brabham v. Turner

109 S.E. 806, 118 S.C. 30, 1921 S.C. LEXIS 190

Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided December 10, 1921·No. 10764·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

. The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Watts.

This is an appeal from an order of his Honor, Judge Mauldin, sustaining the ordei: of Probate Judge in allowing a claim of Dr. Brabham against the estate of Miss Turner for board and lodging and medical services; the contention being that the claim for board and lodging should not be allowed, as the same were furnished as a gratuity. The exceptions, four in number, are overruled under the authority of Dash v. Inabinet, 53 S. C., 386; 31 S. E., 297; Wessinger v. Roberts, 67 S. C., 245; 45 S. E., 169; and Kaminer v. Kaigler, 113 S. C., 225; 102 S. E., 20.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

. The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Watts.

This is an appeal from an order of his Honor, Judge Mauldin, sustaining the ordei: of Probate Judge in allowing a claim of Dr. Brabham against the estate of Miss Turner for board and lodging and medical services; the contention being that the claim for board and lodging should not be allowed, as the same were furnished as a gratuity. The exceptions, four in number, are overruled under the authority of Dash v. Inabinet, 53 S. C., 386; 31 S. E., 297; Wessinger v. Roberts, 67 S. C., 245; 45 S. E., 169; and Kaminer v. Kaigler, 113 S. C., 225; 102 S. E., 20.

Judgment affirmed.

Brabham v. Turner, 109 S.E. 806, 118 S.C. 30, 1921 S.C. LEXIS 190 (S.C. 1921).

Pincite

109 S.E. 806 (Brabham v. Turner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related