Brabham v. Turner
This text of 109 S.E. 806 (Brabham v. Turner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
. The opinion of the Court was delivered by
This is an appeal from an order of his Honor, Judge Mauldin, sustaining the ordei: of Probate Judge in allowing a claim of Dr. Brabham against the estate of Miss Turner for board and lodging and medical services; the contention being that the claim for board and lodging should not be allowed, as the same were furnished as a gratuity. The exceptions, four in number, are overruled under the authority of Dash v. Inabinet, 53 S. C., 386; 31 S. E., 297; Wessinger v. Roberts, 67 S. C., 245; 45 S. E., 169; and Kaminer v. Kaigler, 113 S. C., 225; 102 S. E., 20.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
109 S.E. 806, 118 S.C. 30, 1921 S.C. LEXIS 190, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brabham-v-turner-sc-1921.