B.R. v. Department of Children & Families

106 So. 3d 512, 2013 WL 461498, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 1932
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 5, 2013
DocketNo. 5D12-4144
StatusPublished

This text of 106 So. 3d 512 (B.R. v. Department of Children & Families) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
B.R. v. Department of Children & Families, 106 So. 3d 512, 2013 WL 461498, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 1932 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The father, B.R., appeals from an order placing his child, N.R., in permanent guardianship. Based upon the State’s proper concession of error, we reverse.

Section 39.621(3)(a), Florida Statutes (2011), requires the Department to file and serve, at least three business days before the permanency hearing, a judicial review social services report which includes a recommended permanency goal and an explanation as to why such a recommendation is in the best interest of the child. The State concedes no such notice was provided. Cf. In re KM., 86 So.3d 556, 560 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012) (reversing where Department of Children and Family Services did not provide mother with proper notice of permanency hearing).

REVERSED.

TORPY, COHEN and JACOBUS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Interest of K.M. v. Department of Children & Family Services
86 So. 3d 556 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
106 So. 3d 512, 2013 WL 461498, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 1932, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/br-v-department-of-children-families-fladistctapp-2013.