BPI SPORTS, LLC v. FLORIDA SUPPLEMENT, LLC, etc.
This text of BPI SPORTS, LLC v. FLORIDA SUPPLEMENT, LLC, etc. (BPI SPORTS, LLC v. FLORIDA SUPPLEMENT, LLC, etc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed October 26, 2022. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D22-0186 Lower Tribunal No. 19-37697 ________________
BPI Sports, LLC, Petitioner,
vs.
Florida Supplement, LLC, etc., et al., Respondents.
On Petition for Writ of Certiorari from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, William Thomas, Judge.
The Alderman Law Firm, Jason R. Alderman, Troy A. Tolentino, Alonso Appeals, and Cristina Alonso (Pembroke Pines), for petitioner.
Weber Law, P.A., and Steven D. Weber, for respondent Florida Supplement, LLC.
Before FERNANDEZ, C.J., and MILLER, and BOKOR, JJ.
PER CURIAM. We treat this appeal as a petition for writ of certiorari and deny relief.
See Vital Pharms., Inc. v. Kesten, 47 Fla. L. Weekly D1783, D1783–84 (Fla.
3d DCA Aug. 24, 2022); Martin-Johnson, Inc. v. Savage, 509 So. 2d 1097,
1098 (Fla. 1987), superseded by statute on other grounds, § 768.72, Fla.
Stat. (2021); High Five Prod., Inc. v. Riddle, 286 So. 3d 890, 890 (Fla. 2d
DCA 2019); Brand v. Old Republic Nat. Title Ins. Co., 797 So. 2d 643, 645
(Fla. 3d DCA 2001).
Petition denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
BPI SPORTS, LLC v. FLORIDA SUPPLEMENT, LLC, etc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bpi-sports-llc-v-florida-supplement-llc-etc-fladistctapp-2022.