BP RE, L.P. v. RML Waxahachie Dodge, L.L.C. (In Re BP RE, L.P.)
This text of 744 F.3d 1371 (BP RE, L.P. v. RML Waxahachie Dodge, L.L.C. (In Re BP RE, L.P.)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC
Treating the petition for rehearing en banc as a petition for panel rehearing, the petition for panel rehearing is DENIED. The court having been polled at the request of one of its members, and a majority of the judges who are in regular active service and not disqualified not having voted in favor (Fed. R.App. P. 35 and 5th Cir. R. 35), the petition for rehearing en banc is DENIED.
In the en banc poll, 6 judges voted in favor of rehearing (Chief Judge Stewart and Judges Jolly, Davis, Dennis, Graves, and Higginson), and 8 judges voted against rehearing (Judges Jones, Smith, Clement, Prado, Owen, Elrod, Southwiek, and Haynes).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
744 F.3d 1371, 2014 WL 805495, 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 3835, 59 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 45, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bp-re-lp-v-rml-waxahachie-dodge-llc-in-re-bp-re-lp-ca5-2014.