Bozeman v. State

846 So. 2d 616, 2003 WL 21203329
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 23, 2003
Docket2D02-832
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 846 So. 2d 616 (Bozeman v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bozeman v. State, 846 So. 2d 616, 2003 WL 21203329 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

Opinion

846 So.2d 616 (2003)

Scotty D. BOZEMAN, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 2D02-832.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 23, 2003.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Julius J. Aulisio, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Robert J. Krauss, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

NORTHCUTT, Judge.

Pursuant to a negotiated plea agreement, Scotty Bozeman pleaded no contest to seventeen counts charged in five cases. Under the agreement, he received three fifteen-year Prison Releasee Reoffender sentences for one count of aggravated assault of a law enforcement officer with a deadly weapon and for two counts of burglary of a dwelling, and five-year sentences for the remaining felony counts, all concurrent. Bozeman's appellate counsel filed an Anders[1] brief suggesting the possibility of sentencing error in connection with the PRR sentences.

The burglary of a dwelling charged in count one of case number CF00-07225 was committed on November 13, 2000, when a PRR sentence could be imposed only if the burgled dwelling was occupied. See State v. Huggins, 802 So.2d 276 (Fla.2001). The record contains no evidence that the dwelling was occupied, and the State advises that it does not object to striking the PRR designation as to that count.

Accordingly, we reverse and remand with instructions to strike the PRR designation from the sentence imposed for count one of case number CF00-07225. Otherwise, we affirm.

STRINGER and COVINGTON, JJ., Concur.

NOTES

[1] Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Boykin v. State
164 So. 3d 1281 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2015)
Rashid v. State
932 So. 2d 1205 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)
Ross v. State
901 So. 2d 252 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
846 So. 2d 616, 2003 WL 21203329, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bozeman-v-state-fladistctapp-2003.