Bozeman v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Bozeman v. State

821 S.W.2d 48, 308 Ark. 96, 1992 Ark. LEXIS 24

Supreme Court of Arkansas·Decided January 21, 1992·No. CR 92-19·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Petitioner, Curtis Wayne Bozeman, by his attorney, Robert P. Remet, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk. His attorney admits that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part.

We find that such error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See Terry v. State, 272 Ark. 243, 613 S.W.2d 90 (1981); In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam).

A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct. In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Petitioner, Curtis Wayne Bozeman, by his attorney, Robert P. Remet, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk. His attorney admits that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part.

We find that such error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See Terry v. State, 272 Ark. 243, 613 S.W.2d 90 (1981); In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam).

A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct. In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964.

Bozeman v. State, 821 S.W.2d 48, 308 Ark. 96, 1992 Ark. LEXIS 24 (Ark. 1992).

Pincite

821 S.W.2d 48 (Bozeman v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related