Bozeman v. State

114 So. 2d 914, 269 Ala. 610, 1959 Ala. LEXIS 563
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedOctober 8, 1959
Docket7 Div. 476
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 114 So. 2d 914 (Bozeman v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bozeman v. State, 114 So. 2d 914, 269 Ala. 610, 1959 Ala. LEXIS 563 (Ala. 1959).

Opinion

MERRILL,'Justice.

The Attorney General, who represents the State in this appellate proceeding, has moved to dismiss the petition because said petition and the briefs supporting it were not served on him as is required in such cases.

The motion is well taken. We have held that without service of the petition and briefs on the Attorney General within the time required, this court is without jurisdiction to proceed and a dismissal of the petition must be ordered. Adkins v. State, 268 Ala. 548, 109 So.2d 749; Golden v. State, 267 Ala. 456, 103 So.2d 62; Bruner v. State, 265 Ala. 357, 91 So.2d 224.

Petition for certiorari dismissed.

LAWSON, STAKELY, GOODWYN" and COLEMA.N, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mb v. Rp
3 So. 3d 237 (Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama, 2008)
Dexter Service Co. v. Thames Lumber & Manufacturing Co.
204 So. 2d 147 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1967)
Banks v. State
170 So. 2d 423 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1964)
Board of Commissioners of the City of Montgomery v. Crenshaw
120 So. 2d 870 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1960)
Cunningham v. State
121 So. 2d 890 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1960)
Thorpe v. State
119 So. 2d 222 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1960)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
114 So. 2d 914, 269 Ala. 610, 1959 Ala. LEXIS 563, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bozeman-v-state-ala-1959.