Bozell v. United States

Fourth Circuit

Bozell v. United States

199 F.2d 449, 1952 U.S. App. LEXIS 3369

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedOctober 8, 1952

Docket449

StatusPublished

Cited by9 cases

This text of 199 F.2d 449 (Bozell v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bozell v. United States, 199 F.2d 449, 1952 U.S. App. LEXIS 3369 (4th Cir. 1952).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Emmett Haydon Bozell was convicted of the crime of fraudulent use of the mails in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and was sentenced to a term of imprisonment in the District of Columbia Reformatory at Lorton, Virginia. He applied for parole to the Parole Board and his application was denied. He has filed with this court a petition to review • the action of the Parole Board in denying his application and terms it an appeal from that Board. The petition must be dismissed. There is no statute permitting an appeal from the Parole Board to this 'Court, nor is the court given any authority to review action by the Board. No such power of review is granted by the Administrative Procedure Act 5 U.S.C.A. § 1001 et seq.; for that act expressly excepts from the right of review agency action which “is by law committed to agency discretion”. 5 U.S.C.A. § 1009. Hiatt v. Compagna, 5 Cir., 178 F.2d 42, 45. Petitioner asserts that the judgment under which he is imprisoned is void; but this is not a matter which we can review on appeal from a petition to review the parole board. Even if the petition be treated as an application for habeas corpus, no ground for relief is stated, since this court is given no power to issue writs of habeas corpus. The members of the court are without power to issue the writ since petitioner has not complied with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. A. § 2255. Meyers v. Welch, 4 Cir., 179 F.2d 707, 708.

Petition dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Emmett Haydon Bozell was convicted of the crime of fraudulent use of the mails in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and was sentenced to a term of imprisonment in the District of Columbia Reformatory at Lorton, Virginia. He applied for parole to the Parole Board and his application was denied. He has filed with this court a petition to review • the action of the Parole Board in denying his application and terms it an appeal from that Board. The petition must be dismissed. There is no statute permitting an appeal from the Parole Board to this 'Court, nor is the court given any authority to review action by the Board. No such power of review is granted by the Administrative Procedure Act 5 U.S.C.A. § 1001 et seq.; for that act expressly excepts from the right of review agency action which “is by law committed to agency discretion”. 5 U.S.C.A. § 1009. Hiatt v. Compagna, 5 Cir., 178 F.2d 42, 45. Petitioner asserts that the judgment under which he is imprisoned is void; but this is not a matter which we can review on appeal from a petition to review the parole board. Even if the petition be treated as an application for habeas corpus, no ground for relief is stated, since this court is given no power to issue writs of habeas corpus. The members of the court are without power to issue the writ since petitioner has not complied with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. A. § 2255. Meyers v. Welch, 4 Cir., 179 F.2d 707, 708.

Petition dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

199 F.2d 449, 1952 U.S. App. LEXIS 3369, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bozell-v-united-states-ca4-1952.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack