Boyter v. City of Charlotte

CourtNorth Carolina Industrial Commission
DecidedDecember 21, 1994
DocketI.C. No. 874194
StatusPublished

This text of Boyter v. City of Charlotte (Boyter v. City of Charlotte) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Carolina Industrial Commission primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Boyter v. City of Charlotte, (N.C. Super. Ct. 1994).

Opinion

WHEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that this matter is REMOVED from the Full Commission docket for oral argument. Accordingly, the Full Commission proceeds to decide the appeal.

This matter comes before the undersigned upon plaintiff counsel's appeal of an attorney's fee awarded by Deputy Commissioner John Charles Rush in a May 11, 1993, Order Approving Compromise Settlement Agreement. In that Order, Deputy Commissioner Rush awarded an attorney's fee of $25,000.00 out of the total $110,000.00 recovery.

It appears to the undersigned that the amount of $27,500.00 representing 25 percent of the total recovery is a fair and reasonable attorney's fee in light of the contingent fee contract (which provided for a 25 percent recovery with or without hearing) and in light of the amount of work which the record reflects on behalf of the attorney.

Accordingly, the Deputy Commissioner's Award of $25,000.00 is HEREBY REVERSED, and the sum of $27,500.00 is HEREBY AWARDED plaintiff's counsel.

This the ___________ day of _________________________, 1994.

S/ __________________________ J. HOWARD BUNN, JR. CHAIRMAN

CONCURRING:

S/ ______________________ JAMES J. BOOKER COMMISSIONER

S/ ______________________ THOMAS J. BOLCH COMMISSIONER

JHB/nwm 12/06/94

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Boyter v. City of Charlotte, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boyter-v-city-of-charlotte-ncworkcompcom-1994.