Boyte v. Stoer
153 So. 845, 114 Fla. 395
Opinion
— The appeal is from a decree requiring appellant to remove an obstruction from a portion of the highway which obstruction it is alleged resulted in peculiar damage to the property of the appellees. ' •
The correctness of the decree depends upon whether or not it is supported by the decree. There is ample evidence to support the decree and the same is affirmed.
Whitfield, P. J., and Brown and Buford, J. J., concur.
Davis, C. J., and Ellis and Terrell, J. J., concur in the opinion and judgment.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Boyte v. Stoer, 153 So. 845, 114 Fla. 395 (Fla. 1934).
153 So. 845 (Boyte v. Stoer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Miller, Et Ux. v. Bay-To-Gulf, Inc.
193 So. 425 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1940)
Marcus v. Hull
195 So. 170 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1939)