Boysaw v. Friedman

Fourth Circuit

Boysaw v. Friedman

320 F. App'x 178

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 6, 2009·No. No. 08-2184·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Donald M. Boysaw appeals the district court’s order granting Defendants’ motion for summary judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Boysaw v. Friedman, No. 1:07-cv-00079-jpj-pms, 2008 WL 4452650 (W.D.Va. Sept. 30, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Donald M. Boysaw appeals the district court’s order granting Defendants’ motion for summary judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Boysaw v. Friedman, No. 1:07-cv-00079-jpj-pms, 2008 WL 4452650 (W.D.Va. Sept. 30, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Boysaw v. Friedman, 320 F. App'x 178 (4th Cir. 2009).

Pincite

320 F. App'x 178 (Boysaw v. Friedman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.