Boysaw v. Friedman

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: April 6, 2009
• Docket: 08-2184
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-2184

DONALD M. BOYSAW,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

MICHAEL FRIEDMAN; HOWARD R. UDELL; PAUL GOLDENHEIM,

Defendants – Appellees,

and

PURDUE PHARMA,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Abingdon. James P. Jones, Chief District Judge. (1:07-cv-00079-jpj-pms)

Submitted: March 26, 2009 Decided: April 6, 2009

Before GREGORY and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Donald M. Boysaw, Appellant Pro Se. Cameron Scott Bell, William W. Eskridge, PENN, STUART & ESKRIDGE, Abingdon, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Donald M. Boysaw appeals the district court’s order

granting Defendants’ motion for summary judgment. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Boysaw

v. Friedman, No. 1:07-cv-00079-jpj-pms (W.D. Va. Sept. 30,

2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED