Boyo v. New York City Transit Authority

72 Misc. 2d 165, 339 N.Y.S.2d 501, 1972 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1266
New York Supreme Court·Decided December 14, 1972·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

John A. Monteleone, J.

This is a motion by a 75-year-old plaintiff to perpetuate her testimony pursuant to CPLB 3101 [subd. (a), par. (3)].

[166] Defendant opposes the motion on the ground that plaintiff has failed to submit a medical affidavit showing a probability that she will not survive until the time of trial.

Effective September 1, 1970 the Legislature amended CPLR 3403 by adding paragraph 4 of subdivision (a), which grants a trial preference in any action upon the application of a party who has reached the age of seventy-five years.” This amendment reflects legislative consideration of the mortality tables.

In light of this amendment, it is the court’s view that CPLR 3101 should be construed so as to give effect to the age of a movant seeking relief thereunder.

Accordingly, plaintiff’s motion is granted solely by reason of her advanced age.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Boyo v. New York City Transit Authority, 72 Misc. 2d 165, 339 N.Y.S.2d 501, 1972 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1266 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1972).

72 Misc. 2d 165 (Boyo v. New York City Transit Authority) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ludwig v. Ludwig
94 Misc. 2d 880 (New York Supreme Court, 1978)