Boynton v. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.

D. Massachusetts

Boynton v. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.

1 F.R.D. 452, 1940 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2002

District Court, D. Massachusetts·Decided October 21, 1940·No. No. 672·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

McLELLAN, District Judge.

The plaintiff having made a motion in writing that the Court order that the deposition of Louis Feldman be not taken by the defendant, the motion appeared on today’s list. The plaintiff did not appear and the defendant did. The motion accordingly is denied, but its denial is not to be understood as a precedent upon the question whether an expert witness of one of the parties should be compelled to express his professional opinion in connection with a deposition taken by the other party.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McLELLAN, District Judge.

The plaintiff having made a motion in writing that the Court order that the deposition of Louis Feldman be not taken by the defendant, the motion appeared on today’s list. The plaintiff did not appear and the defendant did. The motion accordingly is denied, but its denial is not to be understood as a precedent upon the question whether an expert witness of one of the parties should be compelled to express his professional opinion in connection with a deposition taken by the other party.

Boynton v. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., 1 F.R.D. 452, 1940 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2002 (D. Mass. 1940).

Pincite

1 F.R.D. 452 (Boynton v. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related