Boynton v. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.
This text of 1 F.R.D. 452 (Boynton v. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Massachusetts primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The plaintiff having made a motion in writing that the Court order that the deposition of Louis Feldman be not taken by the defendant, the motion appeared on today’s list. The plaintiff did not appear and the defendant did. The motion accordingly is denied, but its denial is not to be understood as a precedent upon the question whether an expert witness of one of the parties should be compelled to express his professional opinion in connection with a deposition taken by the other party.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 F.R.D. 452, 1940 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2002, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boynton-v-r-j-reynolds-tobacco-co-mad-1940.