Boynton v. City of Safety Harbor

Supreme Court of Florida

Boynton v. City of Safety Harbor

169 So. 644, 125 Fla. 143, 1936 Fla. LEXIS 1237

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedAugust 3, 1936

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 169 So. 644 (Boynton v. City of Safety Harbor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Boynton v. City of Safety Harbor, 169 So. 644, 125 Fla. 143, 1936 Fla. LEXIS 1237 (Fla. 1936).

Pincite

Opinions

This appeal is from a decree dismissing a bill of complaint seeking to enjoin the issue by the City of Safety Harbor of $2,600.00 of "Waterworks Revenue Certificates" for the purpose of making additions and improvements to an existing waterworks system of the city, without the approval of the freeholder electors of the city as is required by Section 6, Article IX of the Constitution *Page 144 of Florida as amended in 1930. The revenue certificates are to be paid solely from the revenue derived from the operation of the said waterworks system and otherwise.

The decree should be affirmed on the authority of State, exrel., v. City of Miami, 113 Fla. 280, 152 So. 6, State v. City of Daytona Beach, 118 Fla. 29, 158 So. 300; Boykin v. Town of River Junction, filed July 17, 1936; Williams v. Town of Dunnellon, and Bradley v. City of Homestead, decided at this term.

Affirmed.

WHITFIELD, C.J., TERRELL, BROWN, BUFORD and DAVIS, J.J., concur.

ELLIS, P.J., concurs upon the principle announced in his specially concurring opinion in the case of State, ex rel. City of Vero Beach, v. MacConnell, this day filed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This appeal is from a decree dismissing a bill of complaint seeking to enjoin the issue by the City of Safety Harbor of $2,600.00 of "Waterworks Revenue Certificates" for the purpose of making additions and improvements to an existing waterworks system of the city, without the approval of the freeholder electors of the city as is required by Section 6, Article IX of the Constitution *Page 144 of Florida as amended in 1930. The revenue certificates are to be paid solely from the revenue derived from the operation of the said waterworks system and otherwise.

The decree should be affirmed on the authority of State, exrel., v. City of Miami, 113 Fla. 280, 152 So. 6, State v. City of Daytona Beach, 118 Fla. 29, 158 So. 300; Boykin v. Town of River Junction, filed July 17, 1936; Williams v. Town of Dunnellon, and Bradley v. City of Homestead, decided at this term.

Affirmed.

WHITFIELD, C.J., TERRELL, BROWN, BUFORD and DAVIS, J.J., concur.

ELLIS, P.J., concurs upon the principle announced in his specially concurring opinion in the case of State, ex rel. City of Vero Beach, v. MacConnell, this day filed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

169 So. 644, 125 Fla. 143, 1936 Fla. LEXIS 1237, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boynton-v-city-of-safety-harbor-fla-1936.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack