Boynton v. Champlin

40 Ill. 63
Illinois Supreme Court·Decided April 15, 1867·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam :

Upon an application for a rehearing, -we can-

not entertain a suggestion of a diminution of the record, nor can we receive affidavits. To have rendered the alleged diminution availing, the defendant in error should have moved for a writ of certiorari before joinder in error, or, having joined in error, he should have asked leave to withdraw his joinder for that purpose. By his joinder in error the defendant admitted the record was complete, and, failing to obtain leave to withdraw his joinder before submitting the cause, he is concluded on that subject. We cannot now consider of matters outside of the record upon which the cause was submitted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Boynton v. Champlin, 40 Ill. 63 (Ill. 1867).

40 Ill. 63 (Boynton v. Champlin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Thompson v. Economy Furniture Co.
64 Ill. App. 140 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1896)
Koren v. Roemheld
7 Ill. App. 646 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1881)
Stebbins v. Anthony
5 Colo. 342 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1880)