Boyne v. State
728 So. 2d 246, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 13267, 1998 WL 727407
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 16, 1998·No. No. 97-3116·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinions
ON MOTION FOR REHEARING
Arthur William Boyne seeks a rehearing or rehearing en banc pursuant to Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.330(a) and 9.331(a). He argues that “this court has overlooked or misapprehended certain points of law or fact.” We have not. See Snell v. State, 522 So.2d 407 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988).
DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Boyne v. State, 728 So. 2d 246, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 13267, 1998 WL 727407 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).
728 So. 2d 246 (Boyne v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Rogers v. State
882 So. 2d 423 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)