Boyne v. State
728 So. 2d 246, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 13267, 1998 WL 727407
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 16, 1998
DocketNo. 97-3116
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 728 So. 2d 246 (Boyne v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Boyne v. State, 728 So. 2d 246, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 13267, 1998 WL 727407 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).
Opinions
ON MOTION FOR REHEARING
Arthur William Boyne seeks a rehearing or rehearing en banc pursuant to Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.330(a) and 9.331(a). He argues that “this court has overlooked or misapprehended certain points of law or fact.” We have not. See Snell v. State, 522 So.2d 407 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988).
DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Rogers v. State
882 So. 2d 423 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
728 So. 2d 246, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 13267, 1998 WL 727407, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boyne-v-state-fladistctapp-1998.