Boylston National Bank v. Kilburn

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Boylston National Bank v. Kilburn

68 A. 635, 74 N.H. 327, 1907 N.H. LEXIS 56

DecidedNovember 5, 1907

StatusPublished

This text of 68 A. 635 (Boylston National Bank v. Kilburn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Boylston National Bank v. Kilburn, 68 A. 635, 74 N.H. 327, 1907 N.H. LEXIS 56 (N.H. 1907).

Pincite

Opinion

Parsons, C. J.

The facts agreed establish a right of action to which the brief statement discloses no defence. National State Capital Bank v. Noyes, 62 N. H. 35; Wagner v. Freschl, 56 N. H. 495; State Capital Bank v. Thompson, 42 N. H. 369; Stimson v. Whitney, 130 Mass. 591; Union National Bank v. Neill, 149 Fed. Rep. 711; 1 Am. & Eng. Enc. Law 348.

Judgment for the plaintiffs.

All concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Parsons, C. J.

The facts agreed establish a right of action to which the brief statement discloses no defence. National State Capital Bank v. Noyes, 62 N. H. 35; Wagner v. Freschl, 56 N. H. 495; State Capital Bank v. Thompson, 42 N. H. 369; Stimson v. Whitney, 130 Mass. 591; Union National Bank v. Neill, 149 Fed. Rep. 711; 1 Am. & Eng. Enc. Law 348.

Judgment for the plaintiffs.

All concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

68 A. 635, 74 N.H. 327, 1907 N.H. LEXIS 56, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boylston-national-bank-v-kilburn-nh-1907.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack