Boylston National Bank v. Kilburn

68 A. 635, 74 N.H. 327, 1907 N.H. LEXIS 56
Supreme Court of New Hampshire·Decided November 5, 1907·Published

Opinion

Parsons, C. J.

The facts agreed establish a right of action to which the brief statement discloses no defence. National State Capital Bank v. Noyes, 62 N. H. 35; Wagner v. Freschl, 56 N. H. 495; State Capital Bank v. Thompson, 42 N. H. 369; Stimson v. Whitney, 130 Mass. 591; Union National Bank v. Neill, 149 Fed. Rep. 711; 1 Am. & Eng. Enc. Law 348.

Judgment for the plaintiffs.

All concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Boylston National Bank v. Kilburn, 68 A. 635, 74 N.H. 327, 1907 N.H. LEXIS 56 (N.H. 1907).

68 A. 635 (Boylston National Bank v. Kilburn) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Stimson v. Whitney
130 Mass. 591 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1881)