Boyles v. Kerr
815 S.W.2d 545, 34 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 816, 1991 Tex. LEXIS 166, 1991 WL 175435
Opinion
ORDER
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the request to copy nondocumentary exhibit, to which access has already been restricted by the trial court, and Respondent’s motion to seal are denied, without prejudice to the seeking by applicant or the parties of appropriate relief in the trial court. See Tex. R.Civ.P. 76a(7) (trial court retains jurisdiction to enforce, alter or vacate its order limiting access to court records).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Boyles v. Kerr, 815 S.W.2d 545, 34 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 816, 1991 Tex. LEXIS 166, 1991 WL 175435 (Tex. 1991).
815 S.W.2d 545 (Boyles v. Kerr) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Stroud v. VBFSB Holding Corp.
917 S.W.2d 75 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1996)
Dallas Morning News v. Fifth Court of Appeals
842 S.W.2d 655 (Texas Supreme Court, 1992)