Boyles v. Commissioner

Fourth Circuit

Boyles v. Commissioner

207 F. App'x 276

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 22, 2006·No. No. 06-1474·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Leonard A. Boyles, Jr., appeals the district court’s orders and judgment granting in part and denying in part Boyles’s motion for summary judgment, affirming the Administrative Law Judge’s final decision with respect to Boyles’s date of continuous disability and denying Boyles’s motion to modify the judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Boyles v. Commissioner, No. 1:05-cv-00022 (W.D.N.C. Feb. 1, 2006; Feb 16, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Leonard A. Boyles, Jr., appeals the district court’s orders and judgment granting in part and denying in part Boyles’s motion for summary judgment, affirming the Administrative Law Judge’s final decision with respect to Boyles’s date of continuous disability and denying Boyles’s motion to modify the judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Boyles v. Commissioner, No. 1:05-cv-00022 (W.D.N.C. Feb. 1, 2006; Feb 16, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Boyles v. Commissioner, 207 F. App'x 276 (4th Cir. 2006).

Pincite

207 F. App'x 276 (Boyles v. Commissioner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.