Boyle's Estate

62 Pa. Super. 467, 1916 Pa. Super. LEXIS 452
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Boyle's Estate. Read the opinion of the Court — 67 Pa. Super. 381
Superior Court of Pennsylvania·Decided April 17, 1916·No. Appeal, No. 57·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Trexler, J.,

The findings of an auditing judge, confirmed by the Orphans’ Court in banc, in the absence of clear error are conclusive: Strauss’s Est., 168 Pa. 561; Coulston’s Est., 161 Pa. 151; Moritz’s Est, 239 Pa. 375; Mayhew’s Est., 155 Pa. 94. The auditing judge, in the case we are considering, found that the assignments by virtue of which the appellant claimed the legacies of Margaret Jeandell and Hugh Boyle in the estate of Margaret Boyle, were fraudulent as to the Kensington Credit Company to whom the legatees were indebted prior to the making of the assignments.

[468]*468There was sufficient testimony to warrant the conclusion reached by the auditing’judge.

The decree of the Orphans’ Court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Boyle's Estate, 62 Pa. Super. 467, 1916 Pa. Super. LEXIS 452 (Pa. Ct. App. 1916).

62 Pa. Super. 467 (Boyle's Estate) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mayhew's Estate
25 A. 1017 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1893)
Coulston's Estate
28 A. 1020 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1894)
Strauss's Estate
32 A. 98 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1895)
Moritz's Estate
86 A. 875 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1913)