Boyle v. Zacharie
This text of 31 U.S. 348 (Boyle v. Zacharie) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The judges who were in the minority of the court upon the general question as to .the constitutionality of state-insolvent'laws, concurred in the opinion of Mr Justice Johnson in the case of Ogden v. Saunders. That opinion is therefore to be deemed the opinion, of the other-judges who. assented to that judgment. Whatever principles are established in that opinion, are to be considered no longer .openTor. controversy, but the settled, law of the court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
31 U.S. 348, 8 L. Ed. 423, 6 Pet. 348, 1832 U.S. LEXIS 479, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boyle-v-zacharie-scotus-1832.