Boyle v. United States Department of Justice
This text of 155 F. App'x 351 (Boyle v. United States Department of Justice) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Leroy Edward Boyle appeals pro se the district court’s judgment dismissing without prejudice his action against the United States Departure of Justice and “unknown federal agents” alleging violations of his First Amendment rights. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, Orsay v. Dep’t of Justice, 289 F.3d 1125, 1128 (9th Cir.2002), and we affirm.
The district court properly dismissed Boyle’s complaint because even accepting all Boyle’s allegations as true, including his allegations that unknown federal agents assaulted him by electronic means or devices, Boyle’s complaint fails to state a legally cognizable claim upon which relief may be granted. See Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Dep’t, 901 F.2d 696, 699 (9th Cir.1988).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
155 F. App'x 351, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boyle-v-united-states-department-of-justice-ca9-2005.