Boyle v. New York City Board of Elections

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Boyle v. New York City Board of Elections

185 A.D.2d 953

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedAugust 25, 1992

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 185 A.D.2d 953 (Boyle v. New York City Board of Elections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Boyle v. New York City Board of Elections, 185 A.D.2d 953 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding to validate a petition designating John J. Boyle as a candidate in a primary election to be held on September 15, 1992, for the nomination of the Democratic Party as its candidate for the public office of Member of the Assembly from the 44th Assembly District, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Vinik, J.), dated August 19, 1992, which denied the application.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The Supreme Court properly invalidated those signatures that were witnessed by Commissioners of Deeds who had not taken the oaths of the signatories nor obtained any statements from them as to the truth of the statements to which they subscribed their names (see, Matter of Zunno v Fein, 175 AD2d 935, 936). The appellant’s remaining contentions do not warrant a contrary result. Harwood, J. P., Balletta, Eiber, O’Brien and Santucci, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding to validate a petition designating John J. Boyle as a candidate in a primary election to be held on September 15, 1992, for the nomination of the Democratic Party as its candidate for the public office of Member of the Assembly from the 44th Assembly District, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Vinik, J.), dated August 19, 1992, which denied the application.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The Supreme Court properly invalidated those signatures that were witnessed by Commissioners of Deeds who had not taken the oaths of the signatories nor obtained any statements from them as to the truth of the statements to which they subscribed their names (see, Matter of Zunno v Fein, 175 AD2d 935, 936). The appellant’s remaining contentions do not warrant a contrary result. Harwood, J. P., Balletta, Eiber, O’Brien and Santucci, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

185 A.D.2d 953, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boyle-v-new-york-city-board-of-elections-nyappdiv-1992.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack