Boyle v. George A. Fuller Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Boyle v. George A. Fuller Co.

151 N.Y.S. 1105

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 5, 1915

DocketNo. 6815

StatusPublished

This text of 151 N.Y.S. 1105 (Boyle v. George A. Fuller Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Boyle v. George A. Fuller Co., 151 N.Y.S. 1105 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1915).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We do not think that the placing and maintenance of the uncovered pipe upon the floor was the proximate cause of the injury to the plaintiff, and therefore the finding of the jury that the defendant’s negligence caused the plaintiff’s injury was without evidence to sustain it. The judgment and order must be reversed, and a new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We do not think that the placing and maintenance of the uncovered pipe upon the floor was the proximate cause of the injury to the plaintiff, and therefore the finding of the jury that the defendant’s negligence caused the plaintiff’s injury was without evidence to sustain it. The judgment and order must be reversed, and a new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

151 N.Y.S. 1105, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boyle-v-george-a-fuller-co-nyappdiv-1915.