Boyle v. Frank Newman

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Boyle v. Frank Newman

407 A.2d 503, 122 R.I. 885

CourtSupreme Court of Rhode Island

DecidedOctober 18, 1979

DocketM. P. No. 79-393

StatusPublished

This text of 407 A.2d 503 (Boyle v. Frank Newman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Boyle v. Frank Newman, 407 A.2d 503, 122 R.I. 885 (R.I. 1979).

Pincite

Opinion

The motion for stay is granted. The defendants and the University of Rhode Island are, in accordance with the order of this court dated 12 October 1979, permitted to proceed with its scheduled disciplinary proceedings in its normal fashion. The defendants and the University of Rhode Island are further permitted to carry out any appropriate action called for pursuant to any hearing that may be held in accordance with the University’s disciplinary proceedings subject to judicial review. A stenographic record may be made of the proceedings by the plaintiffs provided that a copy be made available to the University at its expense if desired and further provided that such transcripts shall be held by both parties subject to further order of a court of competent jurisdiction prior to public dissemination.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The motion for stay is granted. The defendants and the University of Rhode Island are, in accordance with the order of this court dated 12 October 1979, permitted to proceed with its scheduled disciplinary proceedings in its normal fashion. The defendants and the University of Rhode Island are further permitted to carry out any appropriate action called for pursuant to any hearing that may be held in accordance with the University’s disciplinary proceedings subject to judicial review. A stenographic record may be made of the proceedings by the plaintiffs provided that a copy be made available to the University at its expense if desired and further provided that such transcripts shall be held by both parties subject to further order of a court of competent jurisdiction prior to public dissemination.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

407 A.2d 503, 122 R.I. 885, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boyle-v-frank-newman-ri-1979.