Boyland v. Board of Elections

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Boyland v. Board of Elections

90 A.D.2d 523, 455 N.Y.S.2d 32, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18574

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 22, 1982

StatusPublished

This text of 90 A.D.2d 523 (Boyland v. Board of Elections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Boyland v. Board of Elections, 90 A.D.2d 523, 455 N.Y.S.2d 32, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18574 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Berkowitz, J.), dated October 21, 1982, which granted an application to set aside the Democratic primary election for State Assemblyman from the 55th Assembly District held on September 23,1982, and directed, inter alia, that a new primary election for said position be held between candidates Fortune and Boyland. Judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements. In view of the substantial difference between the number of irregularities and the plurality, Special Term was correct in ordering a new election (Matter of Ippolito v Power, 22 NY2d 594; Election Law, § 16-102, subd 3). O’Connor, J. P., Brown, Niehoff and Boyers, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Berkowitz, J.), dated October 21, 1982, which granted an application to set aside the Democratic primary election for State Assemblyman from the 55th Assembly District held on September 23,1982, and directed, inter alia, that a new primary election for said position be held between candidates Fortune and Boyland. Judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements. In view of the substantial difference between the number of irregularities and the plurality, Special Term was correct in ordering a new election (Matter of Ippolito v Power, 22 NY2d 594; Election Law, § 16-102, subd 3). O’Connor, J. P., Brown, Niehoff and Boyers, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

90 A.D.2d 523, 455 N.Y.S.2d 32, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18574, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boyland-v-board-of-elections-nyappdiv-1982.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack