BOYKINS v. WARDEN
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA TERRE HAUTE DIVISION MAURICE BOYKINS, ) Plaintiff, v. No. 2:23-cv-00046-JPH-MJD FRANK VANIHEL, □ CHARLENE A. BURKETT, ) Defendants. □ ORDER Earlier in this case, the Court recruited counsel to represent Plaintiff. Recruited counsel filed a motion to withdraw, and the Court granted the motion. Dkt. 101. Plaintiff has filed a motion to extend the appeal deadline. Dkt. 116. That motion, dkt. [116], is denied. The Court cannot extend the deadline for Plaintiff to appeal the Court's Order because the Order is not appealable; instead, it is an interlocutory order that can be appealed only after final judgment is entered, which has not occurred in this case. Cf. Barnes v. Black, 544 F.3d 807, 810 (7th Cir. 2008) (citing Randle v. Victor Welding Supply Co., 664 F.2d 1064, 1066-67 (7th Cir. 1981) (per curiam)) (dismissing appeal of district court denial of motion for appointment of counsel under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1) for lack of appellate jurisdiction because ruling was nonfinal and nonappealable). SO ORDERED. Date: 9/18/2024 Sjamu Pataick Hanlon James Patrick Hanlon United States District Judge Southern District of Indiana
Distribution: MAURICE BOYKINS 285506 NEW CASTLE - CF NEW CASTLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY - Inmate Mail/Parcels 1000 Van Nuys Road P.O. Box E NEW CASTLE, IN 47362 All ECF-registered counsel of record via email
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
BOYKINS v. WARDEN (BOYKINS v. WARDEN) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.