Boykins v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Boykins v. State

730 So. 2d 866, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 6044, 1999 WL 294487

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 12, 1999

DocketNo. 98-3248

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 730 So. 2d 866 (Boykins v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Boykins v. State, 730 So. 2d 866, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 6044, 1999 WL 294487 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We conclude that the sentencing guidelines scoresheet was correctly calculated for the four cases on which the defendant-appellant entered his guilty plea. Defendant loses sight of the fact that if he had gone to trial and been convicted in all four cases, he would have been sentenced consecutively for substantially more time than was imposed under the plea bargain. The order denying the motion for postconviction relief is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We conclude that the sentencing guidelines scoresheet was correctly calculated for the four cases on which the defendant-appellant entered his guilty plea. Defendant loses sight of the fact that if he had gone to trial and been convicted in all four cases, he would have been sentenced consecutively for substantially more time than was imposed under the plea bargain. The order denying the motion for postconviction relief is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

730 So. 2d 866, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 6044, 1999 WL 294487, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boykins-v-state-fladistctapp-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack