Boykin v. United States

District Court, W.D. North Carolina·Decided June 23, 2023·No. 5:21-cv-00103·Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA STATESVILLE DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:21-CV-00103-KDB-DCK REBECCA L. BOYKIN, Plaintiff, v. ORDER UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant.

THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT on the parties’ joint Motion for a Stay or, alternatively, for the Court to close this matter and retain jurisdiction to enforce the settlement agreement. (Doc. No. 63). For the reasons stated in the Motion, the Court will grant the Motion. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT the parties’ joint Motion, (Doc. No. 63), is GRANTED. The Court will close this matter and retain jurisdiction to enforce the settlement agreement in lieu of a stay. See Landis v. North American Co., 299 U.S. 248, 254, 57 S. Ct. 163, 81 L. Ed. 153 (1936). The Clerk is directed to close this matter in accordance with this Order. SO ORDERED ADJUDGED AND DECREED.

Signed: June 22, 2023

Kenneth D. Bell ey, United States District Judge Hei of

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Boykin v. United States, (W.D.N.C. 2023).

Boykin v. United States (Boykin v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Landis v. North American Co.
299 U.S. 248 (Supreme Court, 1936)