Boykin v. Town of River Junction

169 So. 492, 124 Fla. 827, 1936 Fla. LEXIS 1202
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedJuly 17, 1936
StatusPublished
Cited by17 cases

This text of 169 So. 492 (Boykin v. Town of River Junction) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Boykin v. Town of River Junction, 169 So. 492, 124 Fla. 827, 1936 Fla. LEXIS 1202 (Fla. 1936).

Opinion

Davis, J.

The Town of River Junction owns an electric light and power system originally constructed in 1923 by the issuance of general obligation bonds voted by the electors. The existing system yields an annual net revenue the expenditure of which by the municipality for any municipal purpose is authorized by law. It does not own its generating facilities.

The proposition now before the Court is an order denying on appeal from an injunction against the issuance of certain “Electric System Revenue Certificates” described in an ordinance of said Town of River Junction adopted under date of March 16, 1936, which ordinance reads as follows:

“Ordinance No. 128.
“An Ordinance Providing for the Construction of Additions ind Extensions to ti-ie Electric Light and Power System of ti-ie Town of River Junction and for *829 the Issuance of $43,000 Revenue Certificates of the Town of River Junction, Florida, Payable Solely from the Electric Light and Power System of Said Town, to Finance the Cost of Suci-i Construction.
“Be It Ordained by the Town Council of the Town of River Junction, Florida:
“Section 1. It is hereby ascertained, determined and declared that:
“(a) The Town of River Junction, Florida (hereinafter called the ‘Town’), now owns, operates and maintains an electric light and power system, the construction of which electric light and power system was financed by the issuance of general obligation bonds of said Town, for the payment of which bonds said Town was required-by law to levy and collect an ad valorem tax upon all taxable property located within the territorial confines of said Town.
“(b) The net revenue of such electric light and power system during the last three fiscal years has amounted to the following sums:
“Fiscal Years Net Revenue
Year ending June 30, 1933 $ 987.86
Year ending June 30, 1934 2,751.47
Year ending June 30, 1935 4,109.09
and the revenue of said system has not been pledged either in whole or in part to the payment of any outstanding bonds or other obligations of the Town. The estimated net revenue of said system in each fiscal year after the construction of the additions and improvements to said system hereinafter referred to, is in excess of the amount to become due in each such fiscal year for principal and interest on the Certificates hereinafter provided for.
*830 “(c) It is necessary and desirable to construct additions and improvements to said electric light and power systems, such additions and improvements to consist of an electric generating plant. The estimated cost of constructing such additions and improvements is $65,458.
“Section 2. For the purpose of financing the cost of constructing said additions and improvements, in excess of the grant to be made to the Town by the United States of America, there shall be issued negotiable electric system revenue certificates of the Town (hereinafter called the Certificates) in the aggregate principal amount of $43,000, which Certificates shall be dated December 1, 1935, in the denomination of $1,000 each, numbered from 1 to 43, both inclusive, in order of maturity, shall bear interest at the rate of four per centum (4%) per annum payable semi-annually on June 1 and December 1 in each year, first interest being payable June 1, 1936, payable as to both principal and interest at the office of the Town Clerk of the Town, in such coin or currency as is, on the respective dates of payment of the same, legal tender for the payment of public and private debts, and shall mature serially on December 1, in the year and amounts as follows, to-wit:
“Year Amount
1939-1942, inclusive $1,000
1943-1948, inclusive 2,000
1949-1957, inclusive 3,000
“Said Certificates shall be signed by the Mayor of the Town and sealed with the corporate seal of said Town attested by the Town Clerk; and the interest coupons attached to said Certificates shall be executed with the facsimile signatures of said Mayor and said Town Clerk.
“Section 3. The Certificates and coupons attached thereto shall be in substantially the following form, to-wit:
*831 “No_________ $1,000
“United States of America
“State, of Florida
“County of Gadsden
“Town of River Junction
“Electric System Revenue Certificates
“The Town of River Junction, in the County of Gadsden, a municipal corporation of the State of Florida, for value received, hereby promises to pay to bearer solely from the Bond Fund provided therefor as hereinafter set forth, the principal sum of One Thousand Dollars ($1,000) on December 1, 19 — , and to pay interest on said principal sum semi-annually from said Bond Fund, at the rate of four per centum (4%) per annum on June 1 and December 1 in each year until maturity of the principal sum thereof, in each year until maturity of the principal sum thereof, upon the presentation and surrender of the annexed interest coupons as they severally become due. Both principal and interest are payable at the office of the Town Clerk in the Town of River Junction, Florida, in any coin or currency which on the respective dates of payment of the same is legal tender for the payment of public and private debts.
“This certificate is one of an authorized issue limited to an aggregate principal amount of Forty-three thousand dollars ($43,000). all of like date and tenor, except as to number and maturity, issued by said Town, under the authority of and in full compliance with the Constitution and Statutes of the State of Florida, particularly the Charter of said Town and an ordinance duly adopted by the Town Council of said Town providing for the construction of certain improvements to the electric light and power system of said Town. Said ordinance provides that the Town shall fix and maintain rates and collect charges for the facilities and *832 service afforded by the electric light and power system which will provide revenues sufficient at all times, to pay the cost of operation, maintenance and repairs of said system, and to pay into the Bond Fund created and designed by said ordinance as ‘Electric System Revenue Certificates Sinking Fund’ a sufficient amount of revenues over and above such cost of operation, maintenance and repairs, to pay the interest on and the principal of said certificates as the same respectively become due.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Thymewood Apartments, Ltd.
123 B.R. 969 (S.D. Ohio, 1991)
City of New Smyrna Beach v. State
132 So. 2d 145 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1960)
State v. City of Miami
7 So. 2d 146 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1942)
State v. City of Fort Lauderdale
5 So. 2d 263 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1941)
Neff v. City of Jacksonville
190 So. 468 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1939)
State v. City of Tampa
187 So. 604 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1939)
Dickey v. City of Fort Lauderdale
186 So. 427 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1939)
Trudnak v. City of Fort Pierce
185 So. 353 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1938)
State v. City of Deland
185 So. 343 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1938)
Hess v. City of Orlando
183 So. 473 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1938)
Marvin v. Housing Authority of Jacksonville
183 So. 145 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1938)
State v. City of Fort Pierce
182 So. 774 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1938)
State v. City of Hollywood
179 So. 721 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1938)
Brooks v. City of Jacksonville
173 So. 365 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1937)
State Ex Rel. City of Arcadia v. Daniel
169 So. 645 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1936)
Williams v. the Town of Dunnellon
169 So. 631 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1936)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
169 So. 492, 124 Fla. 827, 1936 Fla. LEXIS 1202, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boykin-v-town-of-river-junction-fla-1936.