Home/Supreme Court of South Carolina/Boykin v. State Highway Department

Boykin v. State Highway Department

144 S.E. 227, 146 S.C. 483, 1928 S.C. LEXIS 138
Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided July 27, 1928·No. 12490·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice StabeER.

This is an action in the original jurisdiction of the Court for a permanent injunction, to restrain the State Highway Department from constructing and hard-surfacing a section of road, about 5.4 miles in length, proposed by the department as a substitute for a part of the road on Route No. 26, between the Town of Rembert and the City of Camden, which the petitioners allege, the highway department is without authority of law to do.

In 1924 the Legislature passed an Act (33 Stat., 1193), known as the “Pay-As-You-Go” Act, the title of which is as follows:

*485

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Boykin v. State Highway Department, 144 S.E. 227, 146 S.C. 483, 1928 S.C. LEXIS 138 (S.C. 1928).

144 S.E. 227 (Boykin v. State Highway Department) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cohen v. City of Hartford
710 A.2d 746 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1998)
Holloway v. Purcell
217 P.2d 665 (California Supreme Court, 1950)
Heidt v. State Highway Department
1 S.E.2d 188 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1939)
Fant v. State Highway Department
162 S.E. 262 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1931)
Cooke v. State Highway Department
155 S.E. 228 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1930)
Sloan v. State Highway Department
148 S.E. 183 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1929)
Hargrove v. Sawyer, Highway Commissioner
146 S.E. 685 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1929)
Northwestern Railroad v. State Highway Department
144 S.E. 926 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1928)
Fairey v. Sawyer, Com'r
144 S.E. 926 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1928)