Boykin v. State

541 So. 2d 719, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 838, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 1703, 1989 WL 30829
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 5, 1989·No. No. 88-0746·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the judgments of conviction but vacate the special conditions of probation requiring completion of a residential substance abuse treatment program, payment of restitution and payment of costs. Appellant is entitled to appropriate notice and an opportunity to be heard on each of these issues. Procedural due process requires no less.

[720] AFFIRMED IN PART; VACATED IN PART; REMANDED.

HERSEY, C.J., and ANSTEAD and WALDEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Boykin v. State, 541 So. 2d 719, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 838, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 1703, 1989 WL 30829 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

541 So. 2d 719 (Boykin v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In the Interest of F.A. v. State
616 So. 2d 1092 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)