Boykin v. State

541 So. 2d 719, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 838, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 1703, 1989 WL 30829
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 5, 1989
DocketNo. 88-0746
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 541 So. 2d 719 (Boykin v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Boykin v. State, 541 So. 2d 719, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 838, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 1703, 1989 WL 30829 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the judgments of conviction but vacate the special conditions of probation requiring completion of a residential substance abuse treatment program, payment of restitution and payment of costs. Appellant is entitled to appropriate notice and an opportunity to be heard on each of these issues. Procedural due process requires no less.

[720]*720AFFIRMED IN PART; VACATED IN PART; REMANDED.

HERSEY, C.J., and ANSTEAD and WALDEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In the Interest of F.A. v. State
616 So. 2d 1092 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
541 So. 2d 719, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 838, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 1703, 1989 WL 30829, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boykin-v-state-fladistctapp-1989.