Boykin v. State

42 So. 999, 148 Ala. 608, 1906 Ala. LEXIS 380
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided December 20, 1906·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

SIMPSON, J.

— In this case the defendant was convicted of the crime of rape ,and sentenced to imprisonment in the pentitentiary for 10 years. . .

There is an entire absence of proof as to- the venue. While the prosecutrix speaks of going from St. Stephens to the home of the defendant, neither she nor any other witness gives any intimation as to either the direction or the distance from said St. Stephens of the defendant’s house. While the court judicially knows that St. Stephens is in Washington county, yet it also knows that it is only a -feAv miles from the county line. Consequently the general charge, requested in writing by the defendant, should have been given.— Barnes v. State, 134 Ala, 36, 41, 42, 32 South. 670; Harvey v. State, 125 Ala. 47, 49, 27 South. 763; Brotan v. State, 100 Ala. 92, 93, 14 South. 761.

The judgment of the court is reversed, and the cause remanded.

Tyson, O. J., and Dowdell and Anderson, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Boykin v. State, 42 So. 999, 148 Ala. 608, 1906 Ala. LEXIS 380 (Ala. 1906).

42 So. 999 (Boykin v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Holder v. State
97 So. 613 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1923)
People v. Warner
167 N.W. 878 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1918)
People v. Ayers
148 N.W. 383 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1914)